Wednesday, June 30, 2004

Justifying Dick's Mouth

1. Though it was on the Senate floor, Dick's comments weren't a violation of Senate rules, because they told Sen. Leahy to "Go" somewhere before doing it. That would be the Condi Rice version.

2. Well, at least they've learned that saying "Bring it on" doesn't work in a fight.

3. More brilliant misdirection. See instead of realizing that Dick's intent is for him to to F%&^ us all, Dick's got us thinking he wants the Demoocrats to F*#* themselves. We'll never figure that one out!

4. Seeing that last statement and judging from the hairdos at the Republican convention, if the GOP really does tell us Democrats to go F#&^ ourselves, should we really be offended? Does it really change our plans?

5. Ashcroft wasn't able to throw the veil over his mouth in time. Tom Ridge was not aware of any reason to need the veil.

6. Dick just wanted to see whether, if he said something like that, Con. Robin Hayes (R-NC) would suggest using Lysol spray to clean up afterwards.

7. This is a side effect of Viagra they don't mention in the ads.

8. Dick didn't realize that if Senators could do that, they, of all people, would never leave the bed.

10. It wasn't so bad, Dick did tell Leahy that if he wasn't sure how to perform the act, Colin Powell has the instructions down pat.

11. Well, if you're Dick Cheney, telling someone to go to Hell is kind of an ironic insult.

Read more!

Andy Travis, we need you!

NPR is running a story today about a new format on FM radio (neoRadio) that's gaining some popularity. The novel idea? They play more music! (And apparently be like college stations and public radio stations.)

It got me to thinking, in light of the histrionics about how divided this country is, that whether you believe civil war is about to start or not (I don't for later stated reasons) one thing that may be dividing us up more than anything is the lack of decent radio station to which we can all turn. We no longer really tune into radio, and if we do, it's usually to a single station that has a tiny playlist, or we listen to NPR all day or talk radio. As a result, the single most ubiquitous collective media in this country for the last 8 decades is more or less become an assortment of caves which many of us never enter and all of us come out angry at the other caves' dwellers. (there's a Plato reference here that a more erudite writer might nail, but not me. At least I wrote erudite!)

Now, I'm no radio historian, but it seems that 20 years ago radio stations were not nearly as specialized, and as a result it was more likely that people would be listening to the same one. More importantly, they were more likely to be trying to play the latest Springsteen song or Run DMC tune than hitting us with commercial after commercial. We even listened to AM stations for music on occasion, though mostly this was oldies.

But at some point, the radio dial became Balkanized, and now, music radio has become just plain bad. And when it became bad, when people got into their cars they went for something that wasn't so bad. Some folks, like my brother, turned to Talk Radio, others, like myself, turned to NPR. Now there comes a certain point when you just can't reconcile what you hear on NPR and Talk Radio. Somebody's lying (I'd say, look for the ones with actual real fact checkers to judge who's telling the truth. But that issue will be repeatedly and thoroughly addressed.) and the other side's got every reason not to believe a word the other guy says. Thus, we have Michael Moore and Bill O'Reilly going at it, it's no wonder we think we're so far apart.

So, why is radio becoming so Balkanized?

Of course radio was always somewhat specialized. In my hometown of Greensboro, there was Rock 92, playing classic rock, 102Jamz playing hip-hop and R&B, KissFM to play pop, WTQR playing country, etc, and in many ways they still occupy the same slightly more narrow genre. But nowadays Radio is in-your-face about being specialized, and more often than not, that specialization is not the result of a station's very own Andy Travis, Venus Flytrap and Dr. Fever coming up with their own unique playlists to fit within a wider genre. Rather it's the decision of market analysts and corporations running the stations from distant towns.

As a result of this, the rather particular tastes of the American music lover aren't usually satisfied by radio. The truth is, that while radio has become more intensely formatted, Americans have become much more diverse in their taste. I think this is the result of a several things. First, the introduction and ultimate adoption of Rap into the mainstream in the 80s and 90s linked that music with openly political white music. Thus, RunDMC gave birth to Mike D, while Chuck D gave birth to Rage against the Machine. And the introduction of Rap reintroduced Jazz which reintroduced retro, which allowed bluegrass to come back, which buoyed and was buoyed back by Alt. Country which means you see CD collections with Drive By Truckers, Tribe Called Quest, Wilco, Coletrane and Woody Guthrie, and Benfolds Five.

Second, Rock died, at least as an adult version of the sort of culture dominating music that today is only the domain for Pop bands. Stadium Rock is dead, and thus nobody is waiting around for Aerosmith tickets. Okay, that's not true, they are, but the fact that people are still waiting around for Aerosmith and Bruce Springsteen to sell out stadium concerts is pretty good evidence that Stadium Rock is dying.

There are other reasons about which I know too little to fully describe articulate - the effect of payola, the development of smaller, more independent labels able to introduce new sounds, etc. But the basic point is that where radio has zigged, the collective music taste of America zagged and disbanded, meaning radio can't gobble everybody up as easily.

And, yes, radio became banal and vapid, to use two adjectives I'm sure are not tossed around during morning drive time. There's a reason why folks like Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh and Dr. Laura pass as intelligent on talk radio, just down the dial is Billy Bob and John Boy. The only worthwhile result of the FCC's otherwise craven attack on free speech is that it may force some of these fools out of the business or at least to pay some penance for the bad taste they have wrought upon the American public.

Finally, not too long ago, I was somewhere outside of the reach of public radio, and without mix tapes. I have at times (since I stopped moving the dial past 92 outside of searching for Carolina basketball and Football games) thought that maybe I'm being too much of a snob by totally ignoring commercial radio. But, after searching the dial, I was comforted by remembering why they call it commercial radio. 2-3 minutes of commercial breaks later, I realized it's not that I'm a music snob, it's that when I turn on the radio and leave the comforting voice of Bob Edwards, I like to hear actual music, not commercials. And that's why I left the mainstream, the mainstream is so intent on commercials it makes that self-indulgent, esoteric-as-a-raison-d'etre idiot of a college DJ's two minute tangents seem worthwhile to catch some Modest Mouse or a deep track from Otis Redding. Commercial radio plays the same songs day after day and gives us commercials that treat the listener like a mindless slave to bad taste and Car Dealer rebates.

The truth is, I sometimes catch myself listening to NPR and give myself a good adolescent brow-beating, thinking I should just go ahead and hook an IV of metamucil up, by a volvo and join AARP to get it all over with. At 29, that's a said path to take. I'd love to have a radio station that played music I liked, and even some I hadn't heard. And I'd like it even more if it were to bring Americans back to the higher side of the FM dial for music. WE NEED MORE MUSIC, LESS TALK. At least, if the talk is going to be Michael Moore against Bill O'Reilly.

Read more!

Tuesday, June 29, 2004

Quotable? Bloody unbelievable!!!

Go here and scroll down to "quotable" and just be stunned. Though I wonder where the ellipses in this quote lead, it appears that even Jesse Helms thinks Bush has taken tax cuts too far.

Okay, I'm not one to leave you in suspense, here's the quote:

"I would not have voted for [President Bush's] tax cut, based on what I know. . . . There is no doubt that the people at the top who need a tax break the least will get the most benefit. . . . Too often presidents do things that don't end up helping the people they should be helping, and their staffs won't tell them their actions stink on ice."

Needless to say, this isn't some little throwaway line to add to an otherwise totally unrelated Washington Post article about convention speakers. This is something to spend an entire editorial section on. As a North Carolinian, my jaw dropped. When did my former Senator become Teddy Kennedy? About a year ago, Jesse apologized for his opposition to AIDS research, now this?! What's next, support for affirmative-action?

What's interesting about Helms suddenly having religion (for real this time) on taxes, is that it's about as diametrically opposed to the current North Carolina GOP as you could possibly be. One Republican running for Richard Burr's 5th District Congressional seat proudly proclaims that she has never voted against a tax cut. Not that she merely opposes tax increases and additional government spending, but that she basically will agree to any tax cut, regardless of consequences. Granted, this is in the midst of the parallel universe that is a Republican primary (every candidate has subtly decided to not proclaim that end times are nigh, and the Lord is Risen in showing how much they support Christian values), but I'd hope even the most anti-tax conservatives can do the math to figure out that not every tax cut is a smart tax cut.

Apparently Jesse can. And I'm happy for him. In fact, in many ways North Carolina Democrats owe a debt to Jesse Helms, he's led the Republicans here towards the cliffs of political oblivion. And it looks like, while he was able to keep running like the roadrunner, the rest will follow Wile E. Coyote. Instead of opting for Elizabeth Dole's camouflaged as compassionate conservatism, the GOP continues to pursue GOD, GOD, GOD and more GOD, which means they scare the daylights out of moderate North Carolinians. A nasty little secret of this "red" state is that precious few GOP candidates besides Helms have been able to garner more than 52% of the vote in statewide elections. All but two of the current statewide offices are held by Democrats, and Helms clone Lauch Faircloth was dumped by a then relatively unknown John Edwards. While North Carolina voters gave Helms the benefit of the doubt, as attitudes shifted through the 1980s and 1990s, they haven't given the same to his conservative followers. (And this is not simply because of race. Incumbency is the biggest asset Helms has, and even the far right candidates running for the GOP are afraid to be as blatantly racial in their campaigns as Helms.)

Unfortunately, the GOP primary has become extraordinarily more focused on conservative bonafides such as opposition to abortion, gay marriage and tax cuts at any cost. There really has been no other Republican hero in this state besides Jesse Helms,
ever. So his strategy is the template for most GOP candidates and his endorsement is the greatest bounty in primaries. However, this makes the mistake of seeing North Carolina's political trajectory as headed towards the right side of the political spectrum, following more conservative states in the deep south and the rural west. In truth, the history of this state is one of rather stable balance in the middle of the spectrum, a state more concerned about economic progress than conservative piety. There's no reason to expect that history of moderation to change, especially as North Carolina becomes more dependent upon the sorts of industries that require highly educated workers and voters than places like Mississippi or Montana.

In gerrymandered districts (especially those stripped of Democratic votes because of majority-minority districts) Helms' conservatism can win the day. But statewide, a moderate Democrat is starting from a strong advantage over a GOP candidate either anointed in Pat Robertson/Franklin Graham sort of conservative beauty contest or mortally wounded as a moderate pragmatic choice in the same.

There are a lot of complaints I have about the current state of the North Carolina Democratic Party, and ways in which I think it could be more effective. This state still has elements which retard social progress. But thanks to Jesse Helms, this state is only Red in the imaginations of beltway pundits.


Read more!

Thursday, June 17, 2004

And we're worried about Iraqis losing people?

Seven months later, however, the detainee - a reputed senior officer of Ansar al-Islam, a group the United States has linked to Al Qaeda and blames for some attacks in Iraq - is still languishing at the prison but has only been questioned once while in detention, in what government officials acknowledged was an extraordinary lapse.

"Once he was placed in military custody, people lost track of him, a senior intelligence official conceded Wednesday night. "The normal review processes that would keep track of him didn't."


Yep, "military custody" can be a black hole that way. That somewhat disturbing admission is found in this article in the Times on how

Rumsfeld and Tenet authorized the hiding of Iraqi detainees from the Red Cross. "Proud" to be an American is taking on an entirely different meaning these days. Isn't it.

Read more!

Wednesday, June 16, 2004

Introducing Lean Forward

Finally, no more long emails to my friends about news items they never even considered. (I'm sure those included in reply-all dialogues will breathe a sigh of relief.) No, after years of pontificating in the semi-private space of my own To list, I'm now officially publishing the diatribes. Probably not daily, but hopefully weekly. In the mean time I'll point out some news items that catch my eye. And just to make it interesting I'll be hitting a point or two about food, music, sports and culture every now and then.

The title is a reference to a chapter ending line from Jack Kerouac's On the Road: "But we lean forward to the next crazy venture beneathe the skies." Not only does it symbolize the adventurous uninhibited experience of America that I think is healthy, (though perhaps less medicated than Cassidy) but it also embodies the general direction of society - not quite ready to take the next step, but always needing to move our feet to keep from falling on our own face.

So let the games begin...

Read more!